Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1908-1918 – 1917 Femme assise dans un fauteuil rouge
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition presents a figure seated in what appears to be an armchair. The artist has fragmented and reassembled forms, creating a sense of simultaneity and multiple perspectives within a single plane. A dominant palette of blues, yellows, reds, and grays contributes to the work’s overall visual complexity.
Here we see a deliberate dismantling of traditional perspective. The figure is not rendered realistically; instead, its constructed from geometric shapes – planes and angles that overlap and intersect. This fracturing extends beyond the human form, affecting the chair as well, which appears similarly deconstructed. The background isn’t a space receding into depth but rather another series of interlocking planes, echoing the fragmentation of the foreground.
The color choices are significant. The blues suggest introspection or melancholy, while the yellows introduce an element of warmth and perhaps even defiance against the cooler tones. The red, concentrated in certain areas, draws attention to specific points – a suggestion of vitality or emotional intensity amidst the overall abstraction.
Theres a palpable tension between solidity and ephemerality. While the geometric forms suggest structure and permanence, their fractured nature implies instability and a breakdown of conventional representation. This could be interpreted as an exploration of subjectivity – a depiction not of how something is, but how it is perceived or experienced from multiple viewpoints simultaneously.
The absence of clear spatial cues and the flattening of perspective contribute to a sense of ambiguity. The viewer is denied a comfortable, singular vantage point; instead, they are invited to actively engage with the work, piecing together its fragmented elements. This challenges traditional notions of representation and invites contemplation on the nature of perception itself.
The overall effect is one of intellectual rigor combined with an underlying emotional resonance – a portrait not simply of a person, but of a state of mind or a moment in time fractured and reassembled through the artist’s unique vision.