Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1908-1918 – 1908 Nature morte au bouquet de fleurs
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
ФИЗИКА ВРЕМЕНИ
Сжимается, потом летит…
И физика его настолько
Непостижима, – ибо долька
Успеха крахом вам грозит.
You cannot comment Why?
To the right of the floral arrangement, a green ceramic vessel sits alongside what appears to be a metallic structure – possibly a teapot or similar domestic object. A single sphere rests atop this metal form, adding another element of geometric precision. The objects are arranged on a table surface that is divided into distinct planes of color: dark browns and ochres occupy the left side, transitioning to warmer reds and oranges on the right. This division creates a sense of spatial ambiguity, flattening the depth and contributing to the overall fractured feel.
The artist’s use of light is equally significant. It doesnt create realistic shadows or highlights; instead, it serves to emphasize the planar nature of the objects and their separation from one another. The color palette is rich and earthy, yet the application of paint appears deliberate and somewhat coarse, further reinforcing a sense of constructed reality rather than observed naturalism.
Subtextually, the painting seems to explore themes of deconstruction and reconstruction. The recognizable elements – flowers, vessels, fruit – are broken down into their essential forms and then reassembled in an unconventional manner. This process suggests a questioning of traditional notions of representation and beauty. The deliberate lack of depth and the flattened perspective contribute to a sense of detachment, as if the viewer is observing not a scene from life but rather a carefully arranged collection of objects subjected to artistic manipulation. Theres a quiet tension between familiarity and abstraction; the objects are recognizable, yet their arrangement defies conventional logic, inviting contemplation on the nature of perception and the artist’s role in shaping reality.