Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1889-1907 – 1907 Les demoiselles dAvignon 2
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figures are not presented in a unified narrative; instead, they seem to exist simultaneously within the frame, their gazes directed outwards with varying degrees of intensity. Some appear confrontational, while others exhibit a detached or even vacant expression. The woman on the left raises her arm in what could be interpreted as either a gesture of greeting or warning. Two figures in the center extend their arms upwards, creating a sense of visual tension and spatial ambiguity. The figure to the right is rendered with particularly distorted features, its face resembling a mask.
The background appears fragmented and abstract, further emphasizing the breakdown of traditional pictorial depth. Geometric shapes and planes intersect and overlap, contributing to the overall feeling of disorientation. A still life element – a bowl containing fruit – is positioned at the lower center, offering a small area of relative stability amidst the chaos.
Subtexts within this work suggest a radical departure from established artistic conventions. The distortion of form and the flattening of space challenge traditional notions of beauty and representation. The confrontational gazes of the figures can be interpreted as a rejection of passive observation and an assertion of agency. The inclusion of the hybrid figure introduces elements of mythology and primal energy, hinting at a deeper exploration of human nature and its relationship to the animal world.
The painting’s unsettling quality likely stems from its deliberate disruption of visual expectations. It seems to question the very foundations of Western art, paving the way for new modes of expression that prioritize conceptual innovation over mimetic accuracy. The works impact lies not in what it depicts literally, but in how it fundamentally alters our perception of space, form, and representation.