Fantasia. 1925 Kuzma Sergeevich Petrov-Vodkin (1878-1939)
Kuzma Sergeevich Petrov-Vodkin – Fantasia. 1925
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1000×708 px (0,1 Mb)
Painter: Kuzma Sergeevich Petrov-Vodkin
Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin’s creations were a weighty contribution to Russian painting. His striking work, Fantasia, echoes other famous paintings in color and motifs. But "Fantasia" is original and inimitable; the feelings and thoughts behind it are distinguished by strong emotional charge and depth. The canvas was created in 1925. At the height of his creative powers the artist presents a new masterpiece to the world.
A description of Kuzma Petrov Vodkin’s painting Fantasia
Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin’s creations were a weighty contribution to Russian painting. His striking work, Fantasia, echoes other famous paintings in color and motifs.
But "Fantasia" is original and inimitable; the feelings and thoughts behind it are distinguished by strong emotional charge and depth.
The canvas was created in 1925. At the height of his creative powers the artist presents a new masterpiece to the world. Nature landscape with urban landscape acts as a background. Smooth and rhythmic brush strokes. The background colors are calm, consistent with the natural. Green, blue and shades of brown are diluted with white stripes.
The central character of the painting is a young man sitting on a scarlet horse. The horse’s bright red color captures the main attention. It acts as a revolutionary, fiery, impetuous color. The figure of the animal is hovering in a jump, it seems to be soaring above the ground. The red horse is interpreted as a symbol of the October Revolution itself. So significant was this event for the Russian artist, and for the fate of the country.
Unusual is the character of composition. In the picture there are practically no strict horizontal and vertical lines. Instead of them the painter took the basis of oblique axes. Mountains, outlines of plains, even feather clouds are ruled chaotically. The effect gives dynamics to the image and makes the entire space of the composition spherical.
Symbolic painting by Petrov-Vodkin magnificently reflects the mood of the epoch. The red horse as a sign of the new fiery revolution, he is in the painting "Fantasia" aspiring to the heavenly heights, to hitherto unknown discoveries and peaks.
The simple and laconic background is combined in the painting with a fantastic main figure. As a result, the image seems poetic, sublime and mysteriously appealing.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
Below this elevated position lies a cluster of buildings, depicted with a simplified, almost schematic quality. These structures are rendered in muted tones, contrasting sharply with the vibrancy of the red figure above. Their placement suggests a settlement or village, but their indistinct nature prevents any specific identification. The landscape itself is characterized by undulating hills and a hazy sky, painted in cool blues and greens that contribute to an overall feeling of melancholy or introspection.
The color palette plays a significant role in shaping the painting’s meaning. The intense red of the rider and horse could symbolize passion, revolution, or perhaps even sacrifice. Its prominence against the subdued background creates a visual tension, suggesting a disruption of the established order represented by the village below. The cool tones of the landscape evoke a sense of distance and detachment, reinforcing the feeling that the figure on horseback exists outside of, or above, the everyday concerns of the community.
The painting’s subtexts hint at themes of ambition, societal upheaval, and individual agency. It is possible to interpret the scene as an allegory for progress or change, with the red figure representing a force that seeks to transcend existing limitations. The indistinct nature of the village allows for multiple interpretations; it could symbolize tradition, stagnation, or simply the anonymity of collective life. Ultimately, the work invites contemplation on the relationship between the individual and society, and the potential for both conflict and transcendence within that dynamic.