Paris sharmanschitsa. Sketch. AB 1863, gr. c. 27h21, 8 HTG Vasily Perov (1833-1882)

The drawing presents a scene unfolding outdoors, likely within an urban environment given the architectural elements visible in the background. A central figure, presumably female due to the shape and draping of her clothing, dominates the composition. She is depicted with pronounced age; deep lines etch her face, and her posture suggests both weariness and focused intensity. Her attire consists of layered garments – a shawl or cloak draped over a patterned dress – suggesting an attempt at concealment or perhaps a deliberate display of eccentricity.
The woman’s actions are the focal point. She is actively engaged with a small child seated before her, seemingly performing some ritualistic act involving a dark, rectangular object held within a wooden frame. The angle and direction of her arm suggest shes gesturing towards the child, possibly explaining or demonstrating something. A large cloth is draped over this apparatus, obscuring its precise nature but hinting at an element of theatricality or mystification.
A second figure, also a young boy, stands behind the central woman, his hands clasped in front of him and his head bowed slightly. His posture conveys a sense of deference or perhaps apprehension. A dog lies prostrate at the base of the easel, its form rendered with quick, expressive strokes that capture its relaxed state.
The background is sketched with less detail, but reveals hints of buildings and foliage, establishing a setting that feels both familiar and slightly removed from everyday life. The artist’s use of shading creates depth and volume, particularly in the depiction of the womans face and clothing. The lines are loose and energetic, conveying a sense of immediacy and observation.
Subtextually, the drawing seems to explore themes of performance, belief, and social interaction. The central figure’s actions suggest an attempt at influencing or instructing the child, while the presence of the second boy hints at a wider audience or perhaps a familial connection. The dogs passive acceptance adds a layer of quiet observation to the scene. There is a sense of ambiguity surrounding the nature of the ritual being performed; it could be interpreted as genuine spiritual practice, theatrical entertainment, or even a form of charlatanism. The drawing’s overall effect is one of curious detachment, inviting the viewer to ponder the motivations and relationships of those depicted within this fleeting moment.