Vasily Perov – meal. 1865 Fig. 15, 3h27, 2 TG
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A central table dominates the composition, around which numerous figures are seated. Their postures and expressions vary considerably; some appear engaged in conversation, others seem withdrawn or preoccupied. The artist has rendered them with a degree of individuality, suggesting a diverse group united by this shared meal. A palpable sense of density pervades the scene – bodies press close together, creating a feeling of both intimacy and potential discomfort.
To the left, near an open doorway, stands a figure in work clothes, seemingly observing the proceedings from outside the main gathering. His posture suggests either reluctance or a position of servitude. The door itself hints at a world beyond this enclosed space, adding another layer to the narrative.
A prominent religious icon – a depiction of a crucifixion – is positioned centrally within the room, acting as a visual anchor and potentially suggesting a spiritual dimension to the event. Its placement draws attention but also seems somewhat incongruous with the otherwise secular nature of the gathering. The contrast between the solemnity of the religious image and the bustling activity around it is striking.
The artist’s use of line work contributes significantly to the overall effect. Rapid, sketchy lines define forms and create a sense of immediacy and movement. Details are suggested rather than meticulously rendered, contributing to an impression of spontaneity and capturing the energy of the scene. The lack of shading flattens the perspective somewhat, emphasizing the density of figures and reinforcing the feeling of confinement within the hall.
Subtexts embedded in this drawing appear to explore themes of community, social hierarchy, and perhaps even faith versus everyday life. The presence of the figure at the doorway suggests a boundary between inclusion and exclusion, while the religious icon introduces questions about belief and its role within a communal setting. Overall, the work conveys a complex narrative that invites contemplation on human interaction and societal structures.