Part 1 National Gallery UK – Adriaen van der Werff - A Boy with a Mousetrap
1679
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The boy’s attire suggests a degree of affluence – a richly textured jacket with elaborate detailing, topped by a hat adorned with ribbons. His gaze is directed slightly upwards and to his left, conveying a sense of curiosity or perhaps mild apprehension. He holds a wooden structure in his hands; closer inspection reveals it to be a mousetrap, carefully constructed and seemingly ready for use. A live mouse is visible within the trap’s mechanism.
Several butterflies are scattered across the upper portion of the frame, hovering just beyond the architectural confines of the alcove. Their presence introduces an element of lightness and transience into the scene, contrasting with the seriousness implied by the boys task and the potential for harm represented by the mousetrap. The butterflies could be interpreted as symbols of innocence or fleeting beauty, juxtaposed against a more pragmatic and potentially cruel act.
The architectural framing is significant. The arched opening suggests enclosure but also offers a glimpse beyond, hinting at a larger world outside the immediate scene. This creates a sense of isolation for the boy while simultaneously acknowledging his connection to something greater.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of childhood, responsibility, and the complex relationship between innocence and experience. The boy’s engagement with the mousetrap suggests an introduction to the realities of life – the necessity of dealing with unwanted elements, perhaps even inflicting harm for a perceived benefit. Yet, his youthful appearance and the presence of the butterflies temper this interpretation, suggesting that he is still on the cusp of fully understanding these complexities. The overall effect is one of quiet contemplation, inviting viewers to consider the moral implications of the boy’s actions and the broader lessons about life that they represent.