Metropolitan Museum: part 4 – Style of Rembrandt - Man in a Red Cloak
Style of Rembrandt: Dutch, 1650s or early 1660s Oil on wood; 15 1/8 x 12 1/4 in. (38.4 x 31.1 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist employed a dramatic chiaroscuro technique; intense darkness envelops much of the scene, leaving only portions illuminated to highlight key features. Light falls primarily on the man’s face, hands, and the upper portion of his cloak, drawing immediate attention to these areas. The effect is not merely about illumination but serves to sculpt form, emphasizing volume and texture through contrasts of light and shadow.
The mans expression is complex – a mixture of introspection and perhaps a touch of melancholy. His gaze appears directed inward, conveying an air of quiet contemplation rather than direct engagement with the observer. The slight furrowing of his brow and the subtle downturn of his lips contribute to this impression. His hair, rendered in loose, textured brushstrokes, frames his face and adds to the overall sense of naturalism.
The red cloak is a significant element. Its vibrant color provides a focal point against the somber background, but its texture appears worn and slightly faded, hinting at experience or perhaps even hardship. The way it falls across his shoulders suggests both status (cloaks were often indicators of rank) and a certain casualness, as if he has just shrugged it on.
Subtly, theres an ambiguity to the portrait. While the man’s attire might suggest a person of some means, the overall mood is one of quiet dignity rather than ostentatious display. The darkness surrounding him could be interpreted symbolically – representing solitude, introspection, or even the weight of responsibility. The lack of specific contextual details allows for multiple readings; he could be a scholar, an artist, a merchant, or simply a man lost in thought. This deliberate vagueness contributes to the portrait’s enduring appeal and invites viewers to project their own interpretations onto his character.