Metropolitan Museum: part 4 – Charles Philips - The Strong Family
Charles Philips: English, London 1703–1747 London 1732; Oil on canvas; 29 5/8 x 37 in. (75.2 x 94 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a man, presumably the patriarch of the family, positioned centrally, standing slightly apart from his seated relatives. He holds a cane, a symbol often associated with authority and status. To his right stands a woman, likely his wife, dressed in an elaborate blue gown; her posture mirrors his formality, reinforcing their shared position within the family structure.
The children are clustered around a table laden with chess pieces, suggesting education and leisure activities appropriate for their social standing. Their expressions range from attentive concentration to polite indifference, reflecting expectations of decorum. The youngest child, dressed in white, is positioned prominently near the patriarch, possibly signifying future inheritance or familial continuity.
The interior itself contributes significantly to the overall impression. The green wallpaper, ornate mirrors flanking the fireplace, and the sculpted bust above it all speak to considerable wealth and refined taste. The heavy draperies partially obscuring the windows create a sense of enclosure and privacy, further emphasizing the family’s separation from the outside world.
The carpet beneath their feet is patterned with playing card suits – hearts, diamonds, clubs, and spades – a subtle visual motif that might allude to fortune, risk, or perhaps even the complexities of social maneuvering within the elite circles they inhabit. The subdued lighting and dark tones contribute to a solemn atmosphere, reinforcing the gravity of the occasion and the importance of portraying a sense of stability and lineage.
Subtly, theres an element of stiffness in the poses; it’s not entirely naturalistic. This suggests that the artist was more concerned with conveying status and familial order than capturing individual personalities. The painting functions as a visual declaration of social standing, designed to project an image of prosperity, respectability, and enduring family legacy.