Metropolitan Museum: part 2 – Ghasi - Equestrian Portrait of Maharana Bhim Singh
Ghasi: Indian ca. 1825; India (Rajasthan, Mewar); Opaque watercolor and gold on paper; Overall: 25 1/2 x 20 1/8 in. (64.8 x 51.1 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The equestrian subject is not depicted in dynamic action but rather in a static pose, indicative of a ceremonial occasion rather than a depiction of military prowess. The horse itself is richly ornamented with decorative trappings and appears well-groomed, contributing to the overall impression of opulence.
A large red parasol held aloft by attendants provides shade for the central figure, reinforcing his protected and privileged position. This detail serves as a visual marker of authority and distinction. A crescent moon is subtly incorporated into the upper portion of the composition, potentially symbolizing royalty or divine favor within the cultural context.
The surrounding figures are uniformly dressed in white turbans and tunics, creating a sense of uniformity and order within the procession. They appear to be attendants, guards, or officials, arranged symmetrically around the central figure. Their faces are rendered with less detail than that of the principal subject, reinforcing his prominence. The repetition of similar facial features among these figures suggests a degree of standardization in portraiture conventions of the time.
The background is simplified, featuring a stylized landscape with muted colors and indistinct forms. This deliberate lack of detail directs attention towards the foreground and the central figure, preventing any distraction from the primary subject matter.
Subtly, theres an interplay between formality and potential vulnerability. While the scene exudes power and control through the arrangement of figures and opulent details, the static nature of the procession and the protective presence of the parasol might also hint at a need for safeguarding or a conscious display of authority to maintain order. The painting functions as more than just a portrait; it is a visual statement about status, legitimacy, and the maintenance of power within a hierarchical society.