Metropolitan Museum: part 1 – Elihu Vedder - The Fable of the Miller, His Son, and the Donkey
Elihu Vedder: American, New York City 1836–1923 Rome ca. 1867–68; Oil on canvas; 6 1/2 x 10 3/4 in. (16.5 x 27.3 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
At the center of the scene, a donkey stands patiently, bearing a man seated upon its back. This figure is richly adorned with elaborate headwear and clothing, indicating a position of some authority or status. To his right, another man gestures emphatically, seemingly directing or commenting on the situation. His posture conveys a sense of urgency or perhaps even mockery. A young boy, positioned slightly forward, appears to be observing the interaction with an expression that is difficult to decipher – it could be curiosity, apprehension, or a mixture of both.
In the lower right corner, another figure reclines upon a rough-hewn stone block, seemingly detached from the central drama. His relaxed posture contrasts sharply with the activity occurring nearby, suggesting a passive observer or someone who has become accustomed to such displays. The left side of the painting features two additional figures partially obscured by shadow and distance; their presence adds depth to the composition but remains ambiguous in terms of their involvement in the unfolding narrative.
The artist’s brushwork is loose and expressive, prioritizing capturing a sense of immediacy over meticulous detail. This technique contributes to the feeling that we are witnessing an unscripted moment – a glimpse into everyday life. The light source appears to be coming from the right side, casting shadows that emphasize the textures of the stone wall and the folds in the figures’ clothing.
Subtly, the painting seems to explore themes of social hierarchy and the complexities of human interaction. The contrast between the elaborately dressed man on the donkey and the more humble attire of the other figures hints at a power dynamic at play. The boys ambiguous expression invites contemplation about the lessons he is learning from this scene – perhaps about authority, deception, or the absurdity of social conventions. The detached figure in the corner could represent resignation or a cynical acceptance of societal inequalities. Ultimately, the work leaves room for multiple interpretations, prompting viewers to consider the underlying narrative and its implications.