Metropolitan Museum: part 1 – Peter Paul Rubens - Venus and Adonis
Peter Paul Rubens: Flemish, Siegen 1577–1640 Antwerp mid- or late 1630s; Oil on canvas; With added strips, 77 3/4 x 95 5/8 in. (197.5 x 242.9 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The female figure, partially draped in fabric, exhibits a clear aversion to the man’s touch. Her face is turned away from him, conveying distress or rejection. She sits on what appears to be a mound of earth or rock, her body angled away, further emphasizing her desire for separation. A scattering of arrows and a bow lie near her, hinting at a connection with hunting or warfare – perhaps symbolic of her independence and agency.
Between the two figures stands a small winged child, seemingly observing the interaction with an air of detached curiosity. The presence of this cherubic figure introduces a layer of mythological context, suggesting divine intervention or observation of mortal affairs. A large hound is visible to the left, positioned near a body of water, adding another element of naturalism and potentially acting as a silent witness to the unfolding drama.
The background is characterized by dense foliage and a cloudy sky, creating a sense of depth and enclosure. The artist’s use of light highlights the figures bodies, emphasizing their physicality and emotional intensity. The color palette is rich and warm, dominated by reds, golds, and earthy tones, contributing to the overall feeling of heightened emotion and dramatic tension.
Subtly, the scene explores themes of desire, rejection, and the complexities of human relationships. The male figure’s attempt at restraint could be interpreted as a representation of thwarted affection or an effort to prevent harm, while the females resistance suggests a powerful assertion of autonomy. The presence of the winged child introduces a layer of ambiguity, hinting at a larger narrative beyond the immediate interaction. Ultimately, the painting captures a moment of poignant conflict and unresolved emotion within a carefully constructed mythological framework.