Metropolitan Museum: part 1 – Master of the Béguins, French or Flemish, active 1650–60 - Beggars at a Doorway
Master of the Béguins, French or Flemish, active 1650–60: possibly Abraham Willemsens, Flemish, active by 1627, died 1672 Oil on canvas; 20 1/4 x 23 3/8 in. (51.4 x 59.4 cm)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the left, a young boy, barefoot and clad in tattered garments, reaches out towards the man. A woman, her face etched with hardship, holds a swaddled infant on her back while extending a hand toward him as well. An older man, his beard streaked with grey, clutches a bowl, presumably for collecting alms. Their expressions convey a mixture of hope and resignation. The positioning of these figures suggests their dependence on the man’s generosity.
The man himself is depicted in dark attire – a black coat and wide-brimmed hat – that denotes his social standing. He appears to be assessing the group before him, his posture suggesting a cautious consideration rather than immediate compassion. A partially obscured figure stands further back within the doorway, adding depth to the scene and hinting at an unseen interior space.
The architectural setting is rendered with considerable detail; the rough texture of the stone walls contrasts sharply with the smooth fabric of the man’s clothing. The darkness beyond the archway creates a sense of mystery and perhaps alludes to the uncertainties that lie ahead for those seeking assistance. A discarded hat lies on the ground near the older beggar, further emphasizing their destitution.
The painting explores themes of charity, social disparity, and human vulnerability. It is not merely a depiction of poverty but also an examination of the complex relationship between the affluent and the destitute within a hierarchical society. The artist’s choice to focus on this encounter – a moment of potential generosity or rejection – suggests a commentary on moral responsibility and the obligations of those in positions of power towards the less fortunate. The overall effect is one of quiet dignity amidst hardship, prompting reflection on the human condition and the enduring challenges of social inequality.