Spring. 1917 Konstantin Alekseevich Korovin (1861-1939)
Konstantin Alekseevich Korovin – Spring. 1917
Edit attribution
Download full size: 754×1000 px (0,2 Mb)
Painter: Konstantin Alekseevich Korovin
Album navigation:
Konstantin Korovin is a Russian artist who is considered one of the fathers of Impressionism in Russia. He, like Nesterov and Levitan, created vivid, colorful landscapes that easily rivaled mundane everyday scenes and somber portraits. His work is still considered a masterpiece. After all, it is not for nothing that at the Painting School he was Savrasov’s favorite. His work was always a reminder that the dark streak will end one day.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of Konstantin Korovin’s painting Spring
Konstantin Korovin is a Russian artist who is considered one of the fathers of Impressionism in Russia. He, like Nesterov and Levitan, created vivid, colorful landscapes that easily rivaled mundane everyday scenes and somber portraits. His work is still considered a masterpiece. After all, it is not for nothing that at the Painting School he was Savrasov’s favorite.
His work was always a reminder that the dark streak will end one day. And it’s not just in the perfect selection of colors and shadows, but in the energy of the landscape itself. The painting Spring, painted in 1917, was no exception.
The concept of Impressionism first appeared in France in the late 19th century. It was the French technique, but using the Russian manner, that Korovin wanted to use in his paintings. Only he managed to combine perfectly modernity and tranquility of nature, heat and cold, harmony and riot of emotions. He does not just paint, but narrates, tells a story, as can be seen in the picture. In addition to the birch grove, it depicts people sitting at the table and their home. According to the artist, without these images the landscape would be incomplete, empty, devoid of any meaning.
In the picture "Spring" there are no clear lines or sharp transitions. Thus the artist wanted to convey the invisible and colorless magic of nature, the rebirth of all life after winter hibernation. The colors of objects, as well as their saturation, fully consistent with the emotional tone of the author.
Konstantin Korovin painted only from nature, in the open air. Hence the purity of color and sharpness of understanding of ordinary life, which are deprived of the museum exhibits, painted without soul.
Springtime" is not Korovin’s first work in the Impressionist genre. Prior to that, in 1883, Korovin painted Portrait of a Chorus Girl, which was his first work in this style. It is also considered to be the first worthy work in Russian impressionism.
You cannot comment Why?
The artist’s handling of color is particularly noteworthy. A palette dominated by muted blues and greens establishes an atmosphere of cool serenity. These tones are juxtaposed with touches of warmer hues – yellows and browns – that animate the foreground and suggest the nascent vibrancy of springtime. The application of paint is loose and expressive, characterized by visible brushstrokes that contribute to a sense of immediacy and movement. Light filters through the trees, creating dappled patterns on the ground and table, further enhancing the impression of a fleeting moment captured in time.
The arrangement of figures around the table suggests an informal gathering, perhaps a leisurely meal or conversation. Their postures are relaxed, their interactions understated. The presence of the bare branches of the trees evokes a feeling of transition – a visual metaphor for the shift from winter to spring, and potentially, a broader sense of renewal and hope.
The composition’s perspective is slightly elevated, allowing the viewer to take in the expanse of the landscape while simultaneously focusing on the intimate scene unfolding below. The muddy track leading into the distance draws the eye away from the central group, hinting at journeys undertaken and destinations yet unknown. This subtle element introduces a layer of ambiguity – a suggestion that this tranquil moment exists within a larger context of change and possibility.
The overall effect is one of understated elegance and quiet optimism. It’s a scene not overtly dramatic, but rich in subtle nuances and suggestive symbolism.