Orest Adamovich Kiprensky – Portrait Shishkov. 1825 Nyima, St. Petersburg
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Да... Очень серьёзный дядя. Написано великолепно. Впрочем, Кипренский иначе и не писал.
You cannot comment Why?
The subject’s attire immediately signals status and military service. He wears a dark-colored uniform coat adorned with elaborate gold epaulettes and decorative detailing. A vibrant red sash crosses his chest, further emphasizing his rank. The meticulous rendering of the fabric suggests an attention to detail indicative of both the artists skill and the importance placed on accurately portraying the subject’s position within society.
In his right hand, he holds a sheet of paper, as if pausing mid-reading or having just received correspondence. This gesture introduces a subtle narrative element – a suggestion of ongoing engagement with matters of import. To his left rests a stack of books covered in red and green leather, which reinforces the impression of intellectual pursuits and scholarly interests. The placement of these objects is deliberate; they are not merely props but contribute to the construction of a persona defined by both military service and erudition.
The background is dark and indistinct, drawing attention solely to the figure. This use of chiaroscuro – the contrast between light and shadow – serves to highlight the subject’s face and uniform, enhancing their prominence within the composition. The lighting itself appears natural, illuminating his features without creating harsh shadows, which contributes to a sense of dignified realism.
The overall effect is one of restrained formality and quiet dignity. Here we see not merely an individual but a representation of a man who embodies qualities valued by the ruling class: military service, intellectual capacity, and social standing. The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of duty, knowledge, and the weight of responsibility borne by those in positions of power.