Hermitage ~ part 12 – Fedorov, Sergei. Battle of Borodino August 26, 1812
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Всё замечательно, картина понравилась. Только почему " при Бородине"?, по – моему, надо при Бородино.
You cannot comment Why?
A central figure, distinguished by his uniform and posture, dominates the visual center. He appears to be an officer, seated on horseback and observing the unfolding battle with a detached air. His position suggests authority and command, yet he is not actively engaged in the fighting depicted around him. This separation creates a subtle tension between leadership and action.
The soldiers are rendered with considerable detail, showcasing a range of activities: some advance with bayonets fixed, others fall wounded or dead amidst the trampled ground. The artist has employed strong contrasts in light and shadow to accentuate the dynamism of the scene, highlighting muscular forms and emphasizing the violence inherent in warfare. A palpable sense of disarray pervades the composition; uniforms are torn, weapons are scattered, and bodies lie strewn across the landscape.
The background is less defined, consisting primarily of a dense thicket of trees that obscures any clear horizon line. This deliberate lack of perspective reinforces the feeling of confinement and claustrophobia, drawing attention to the immediate struggle taking place in the foreground. The overall effect is one of overwhelming intensity and human cost.
Subtly embedded within this depiction are elements suggesting national identity and historical significance. The presence of a prominent emblem – likely representing an eagle – in the lower right corner hints at a specific nation or political entity involved in the conflict. The text accompanying the image, rendered in multiple languages, further reinforces its connection to a particular historical event and intended audience. The scene is not merely a representation of battle; it appears designed to commemorate and perhaps even legitimize a national narrative surrounding this engagement.