Boris Grigoriev – Woman in red
1936. 58.3x38.2
Location: Private Collection
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a subject with auburn hair styled in soft waves that frame her face. Her gaze is direct, almost confrontational, yet theres an underlying stillness to her expression. The artist has rendered the features with a degree of realism, but also with a certain simplification – the nose is slightly stylized, and the lips are painted with a bold, saturated red that draws the eye immediately. This vibrant color contrasts sharply with the muted tones of her skin and hair, creating a focal point and suggesting a deliberate choice in presentation.
The woman’s attire consists of a crimson blouse or dress, fastened at the neck with an elaborate bow. The fabric appears to have a slight sheen, adding another layer of visual interest. The brushwork here is looser than on the face, contributing to a sense of texture and movement within the garment.
The background, while abstract, provides a crucial context. The swirling colors evoke a feeling of dynamism or perhaps even emotional turbulence, which contrasts with the woman’s relatively calm demeanor. The floral elements are indistinct, appearing more as patterns than recognizable blooms; they contribute to the overall decorative quality of the work and may symbolize femininity or natural beauty in a veiled manner.
Subtly, the painting suggests an exploration of identity and presentation. The direct gaze implies confidence, while the carefully chosen attire and makeup suggest a conscious effort at self-representation. The contrast between the woman’s composure and the agitated background hints at internal complexities or perhaps a tension between outward appearance and inner experience. It is possible to interpret this as a commentary on societal expectations of women during the period in which it was created, where appearances were often carefully managed.