Nikolay Dmitriev-Orenburgsky – Last battle at Plevna, November 28, 1877. 1889.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a multitude of figures – soldiers, officers, and what appear to be civilian support personnel – engaged in various activities across the field. Many are tending to the wounded, assisting fallen comrades, or simply observing the scene with expressions ranging from exhaustion to quiet grief. A significant number of horses are present, some pulling wagons laden with supplies, others seemingly unattended or injured. The presence of artillery pieces, positioned strategically throughout the foreground and midground, underscores the scale and intensity of the preceding battle.
The composition is structured around a central axis that leads the eye towards a distant line of hills, suggesting both depth and an implied continuation of the landscape beyond the immediate scene. A large wagon train occupies the right side of the painting, its presence indicating logistical support and potentially signaling preparations for further movement or evacuation. The sheer number of individuals depicted creates a sense of overwhelming scale, emphasizing the human cost of war.
Subtleties within the work suggest deeper layers of meaning. The absence of overt displays of heroism or triumphant celebration points towards a more nuanced portrayal of conflict – one that acknowledges not only victory but also loss and suffering. The careful rendering of individual faces conveys a sense of realism and emotional depth, inviting contemplation on the psychological toll experienced by those involved. The subdued color palette reinforces this somber mood, avoiding any romanticization of warfare.
The painting’s subtext seems to lie in its quiet dignity; it is not a glorification of battle but rather a poignant reflection on its consequences – the exhaustion, the loss, and the enduring impact on both individuals and the landscape itself. It speaks to the resilience of those who remain, tasked with rebuilding and carrying forward amidst the devastation.